Web Development

Next.js web development that earns its keep.

We’re a Next.js development agency built for founders and lean product teams. You get a production web application from two senior engineers, shipped in 4 to 8 weeks, on a scope and price agreed before anyone writes code. No account manager. No junior billed as a senior.

What actually lands in your repository.

Custom web application development, described as artifacts rather than categories. These are the briefs we take most often.

A Next.js SaaS platform

Auth, organisation-level roles, Stripe billing with webhook reconciliation, and a dashboard that still renders in under a second at 10,000 rows.

A marketing site your team can edit

A Next.js front end on a headless CMS like Sanity or Payload, so marketing publishes a landing page without opening a pull request.

A rebuild of the site that got slow

We migrate WordPress to Next.js, keep the URL structure, redirect what changes, and build against a Largest Contentful Paint budget of 1.5 seconds on 4G instead of the four you have now.

An internal tool that retires the spreadsheet

Role-based access, an audit trail, CSV import and export, and a Postgres schema behind it instead of forty tabs and one person who understands them.

A storefront wired to Shopify

Next.js against the Shopify Storefront API. You keep Shopify checkout and stop paying the theme-engine tax on every product page load.

An API layer between systems never meant to talk

Typed endpoints, retries with backoff, idempotency keys, and a sync log you can read at 2am when a third-party provider goes down.

Engineering position

We render on the server by default, and we tell you what that costs.

Most React work still ships an empty div and fetches everything in the browser. It looks fine on a MacBook on office wifi. On a mid-range Android over 4G it’s a spinner, a layout shift, and a Largest Contentful Paint north of four seconds. We default to React Server Components for anything content-heavy, so the HTML arrives populated and the browser parses far less JavaScript.

The cost of that choice is real. Server components hold no state. Every interactive island needs an explicit “use client” boundary, and draw that boundary badly and you drag half your tree back to the client anyway. We take that trade for marketing pages, catalogues, and dashboards where the first view is read-only. We don’t take it for a canvas editor or a chart that updates twice a second, where client-side fetching with a proper cache wins on every measure that matters.

TypeScript runs strict from the first commit, and it stops being true the moment data crosses the network. A type assertion on a JSON response is a comment rather than a check, so we validate anything arriving over the wire at runtime with Zod. We generate database types from the schema and never hand-write them. That’s the boring half of the work, and it decides whether the next developer can rename a column without breaking something they can’t see.

We treat performance as a budget and enforce it from the first commit rather than auditing it in the last week. The numbers go in before anyone writes code: LCP under 1.5 seconds, INP under 200ms, CLS under 0.1, and under 150KB of JavaScript on the first route. Lighthouse runs in CI and a regression fails the pull request. The framework almost never breaks those numbers. The analytics tag does, along with the chat widget, the unresized hero image, and the 400KB font.

Accessibility and SEO are structural, so we build them in week one. Semantic landmarks, focus states, and a keyboard path through every flow cost almost nothing up front and are miserable to retrofit in month six. Metadata, sitemaps, and JSON-LD come from the same data that renders the page, so your structured data cannot drift out of sync with what a visitor sees.

We’ll also tell you when Next.js is the wrong tool. A five-page brochure site doesn’t need a React framework. An offline-first field workflow usually belongs in a cross-platform mobile app. And if the real problem is hours lost to manual data entry rather than a slow website, the fix is AI automation, not a rebuild.

Two builds on this stack are written up end to end. Clora AI, our multi-company HR and payroll platform, covers the permission model, the payroll rules and the fingerprint hardware. Content Studio, the editorial workflow tool we built for Mindcob, covers what it takes to replace a spreadsheet a team already trusts.

The stack, and why each piece is on the list.

Framework and language

  • Next.js App Router. Routing, server rendering, and asset optimisation in one place, instead of five libraries and the seams between them.
  • React 19 and TypeScript in strict mode. A column rename should break the build, not production.

Interface

  • Tailwind CSS v4. One file of design tokens instead of a stylesheet that grows every sprint and gets deleted by nobody.
  • Radix primitives for menus and dialogs. Keyboard and screen-reader behaviour isn’t worth rewriting badly.

Data and backend

  • PostgreSQL on Supabase or Neon. Both give you database branching, so you test a migration before it touches live data.
  • Drizzle or Prisma for typed queries. Redis for caching, rate limits, and job queues that survive a deploy.

Content and commerce

  • Sanity or Payload, modelled to your editorial structure rather than dumped into one rich-text field.
  • Stripe for billing, Shopify Storefront API for commerce. Payments stay with providers who solved compliance already.

Infrastructure and quality

  • Vercel or AWS, chosen on your constraints rather than our habit. Preview deploys on every pull request either way.
  • GitHub Actions running type checks, Lighthouse budgets, and Playwright tests on the flows that make money.

What it costs and when it ships.

Most studios make you book a call to get a number. These are the bands comparable work has landed in, and your own scope and price are fixed before kickoff.

Marketing or brand site on a headless CMS, up to 8 pages

2 to 4 weeks

$7.5k to $15k

SaaS MVP with auth, billing, and a dashboard

6 to 8 weeks

$28k to $45k

WordPress to Next.js migration or performance rebuild

4 to 6 weeks

$16k to $28k

Internal tool or admin dashboard

5 to 7 weeks

$18k to $34k

Ongoing development after launch

Monthly

From $2,500 / mo

The bands above are estimates, shown in US dollars and drawn from comparable work already delivered, because no two projects carry the same scope. Your own quote is not an estimate: it is fixed in writing after scoping, before kickoff, and it does not move.

What moves the number

Integrations are the biggest lever. A system with a documented REST API adds three to five days. One with a SOAP endpoint, a PDF spec, and a support inbox adds two weeks. Permission depth comes next. A single admin role is cheap. Per-record sharing across nested teams is not.

After that it’s data migration volume, whether design already exists, and compliance. SOC 2 or HIPAA adds audit logging, encryption at rest, and access review. That’s real engineering rather than a checkbox, and we price all of it before kickoff.

Why we sit between $15 and $150 an hour

Hire a marketplace developer at $15 an hour and you carry the delivery risk. Hire a Western agency at $150 an hour and you fund an account manager, a six-week discovery phase, and a junior billed as a senior. We sit in the middle on purpose, which is why the person you talk to on Monday is the person writing the code on Tuesday.

Payment runs 50% on contract and 50% on delivery, split into milestones above $30,000. You own the repository and the IP from the first commit, not from the final invoice. If you want the full picture across web, mobile, and AI work, the overview of every EdgeBrain service covers the rest, or send us the brief and get a fixed quote.

FAQ

The questions that decide it

Three to four weeks for a marketing site on a headless CMS. Six to eight weeks for a SaaS MVP with authentication, billing, and a dashboard. The clock starts at kickoff rather than at contract signing, and it assumes design is finished or ours to produce. You get a staging URL in week one and a new build every week after that.

Yes, and the redirect map is most of the job. We crawl every indexed URL, map each one to its new route, and 301 anything that moves. We port titles, canonical tags, and structured data before launch instead of patching them after. Your old site stays live until a crawl comparison passes. Expect rankings to settle within three weeks.

You do, from the first commit. We work inside your GitHub organisation where possible, or in ours with ownership transferred at handover. The contract assigns all IP to you and includes an NDA if you want one. No licence fee, no retained component library you keep paying for, and no hosting lock-in.

Four hours with the US East Coast and the full working day with Europe. Lahore is UTC+5. We hold 6pm to 10pm local, which is 9am to 1pm in New York and a normal morning in London. For West Coast teams we shift that window later. You get a shared Slack channel, not a ticket queue.

We quote fixed scope, so a change is a conversation rather than an invoice surprise. We absorb small adjustments inside the same week. Anything adding more than a day gets a written estimate before we touch it, and you approve or defer. A change log in the repo records what was added, what it cost, and what got cut to make room.

Yes. Roughly half our web development work starts from Figma files we didn’t draw. We build to the tokens you already have, and we flag where a spec breaks on a 360px viewport or fails colour contrast before we build it. If there’s no design, we produce it, which adds a week to a marketing site and two to a product build.

Send us the brief. Get a number back.

Tell us what you’re building and what it has to do by when. You get a fixed scope, a fixed price, and a start date within two working days. Email edgebrainstudios@gmail.com or call the number below.